Temperatures in Pakistan cross 52 degrees Celsius — that’s more than 125°F - eviltoast
  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m with you, but it’s not the SUVs that are causing the problem, it’s the fucking corporations that contribute over 80% of the harmful emissions.

    But fuck SUVs and big ass trucks.

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I start to wonder if corporate executives themselves arent responsible for this myth that the meaningful bulk of emissions comes from them. So consumers can feel guilt free about buying these gas guzzling chunkers, after all their choices dont have any meaningful effect on emissions.

      But no, corporate headquarters doesnt have a giant smokestack spewing out those corporate emissions you hear about. Those emissions are coming from…SUV tailpipes! Transportation is the highest emissions sector in the US, and personal vehicles make up the bulk of those emissions, especially trucks and SUVs.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s not the SUVs that are causing the problem, it’s the fucking corporations

      The corporations are the ones that block mass transit infrastructure and extract subsidies for increasingly oversized vehicles. American car companies basically don’t bother making sedans anymore.

      I don’t think there’s a bright line between the two problems. More SUVs = Corporate profit $$$ = More lobbying = No Mass Transit = More SUVs

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      What do this corporations do to cause 80% of emissions? Just burn it for fun?

      No. They make products and services that people buy. Making out people play no part in this doesn’t help anyone.

      • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not just “they make products and services that people buy”, it’s that “they maximize their personal profit at the expense of people and the environment”.

        It’s easy but reductive to blame consumers for consuming, when it’s worth noting that biodegradable packaging costs more than plastics that will never break down, so corporations will choose cheap plastic over environmentally friendly packaging 99.9% of the time.

        The incentives are wrong. Instead of maximizing profit we need to ensure that profit is not maximized at the expense of sustainability, at the expense of pollution, and at the expense of the entire future of our planet.

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s a government issue.

          E.g. a carbon tax will solve a lot of problems, or a tax on waste like plastic. It is very very unpopular with the public though so the government can’t put it in place for fear of being voted out.

          • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s… Really passing the buck though.

            Nothing is stopping corporations from doing The Right Thing right now except their own desire not for profit, but for maximized profit at all costs. Dare I say it, but if a company can’t make a profit without creating harm, it doesn’t deserve to make a profit.

            • Wanderer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The us government has said corporations are legally required to maximise profit for the shareholders.

              Again government issue.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Just burn it for fun?

        The degree to which businesses prioritize political patronage over economic efficiency can’t be overstated. From Shitcoins to Big Box Retailers, we expend enormous amounts of carbon in pursuit of flights of fancy.

        And all those private jets and helicopters out to remote ecologically preserved vacation spots could definitely be defined as “burning fossil fuels for fun”.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I find it fascinated… one side of their mouth, they’re hating corporations. Other side, they’re praising the product(s) they buy from said corporations. If any of these so called, “combatants of climate change” were true to their beliefs, they’d go find a piece of wilderness and live in it.