Biden-Harris Administration Announces Additional $7.7 Billion in Approved Student Debt Relief for 160,000 Borrowees - eviltoast

This brings the total under this administration to $167 Billion in relief for 4.75 million borrowers.

  • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Hypocritical when it’s you holding democracy ransom telling them who to vote for. I am expressing democracy by voting for Jill Stein.

    • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re knowingly throwing away a vote. There’s not much left that is more anti-democracy. But for now- you can enjoy that right.

      • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Projection, you’re literally voting for someone you don’t agree with, so you have a fundamental misunderstanding of democracy.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Who said i disagree with him? I dislike a very few things he’s doing, and disagree with how they’re handled. That’s it.

          I’m an adult though. So I understand nuance. And I also know that compromise is how things get accomplished.

          Go ahead and look through a history book and see how many times protest votes and not booting succeeded in actionable results.

          I’ll wait here.

          • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Who said i disagree with him?

            You claim to be against genocide several times on your account.

            And I also know that compromise is how things get accomplished.

            Your strategy has managed to move this country to the extreme right wing. Time to admit it doesn’t work and try something else.

            Go ahead and look through a history book and see how many times protest votes and not booting succeeded in actionable results.

            Oh the irony, you’re the one with reading to do. I’m building a movement to improve the country and it starts with support. You would be proudly shouting down civil rights protestors back in the day.

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              So…. You didn’t check to see how many times doing nothing has brought change.

              I’m still waiting.

              • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re the one doing nothing, yes I went though history and checked, turns out not doing anything like you changes nothing. Your plan: vote dem and do nothing for 4 years. My plan: build a movement by supporting the Green party so we have an opposition forcing the Dems to give concessions.

                Hilarious.

                • zeppo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The only way that could possibly effective is if it was paired with comprehensive voting reform in every state (well, every state that matters).

                  A third party cannot win with the current first-past-the-post system. It’s so obvious that I can’t imagine why it would need to be explained. Have a good leftist candidate, it’ll take votes from the liberal. Popular conservative alt candidate, will take votes from the Republican. With our current roughly 50/50 balance, either one could result in the candidate with less support for their ideology winning. That’s how you end up with something like (theoretically) 25% Stein, 35% Biden, 40% Trump, and Trump wins because he had the plurality. Great.

                  • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    The only way that could possibly effective is if it was paired with comprehensive voting reform in every state (well, every state that matters).

                    Yes, we’re working on that unlike the Dems.

                    A third party cannot win with the current first-past-the-post system.

                    Yeah they can, if you vote for them.

                    That’s how you end up with something like (theoretically) 25% Stein, 35% Biden, 40% Trump, and Trump wins because he had the plurality. Great.

                    RFK not exist?

                • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You’re going to…. “Build a movement.” Right. So, while you were checking on how much change was brought by doing nothing, did you come across the myriad people that “built movements?”

                  Because that shit pretty much started back in the 60’s. And it took them until 1984 to even start the Green Party. And they’re been “building movements” since.

                  So what exactly are you going to do differently than people more organized and smarter than you didn’t do over the past four decades?

                  • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    You’re going to…. “Build a movement.” Right. So, while you were checking on how much change was brought by doing nothing, did you come across the myriad people that “built movements?”

                    Wow, someone actually arguing that historically movements did not start small, you’re a smart one /s.

                    Because that shit pretty much started back in the 60’s. And it took them until 1984 to even start the Green Party. And they’re been “building movements” since.

                    More than you’ve ever achieved in your life.

                    So what exactly are you going to do differently than people more organized and smarter than you didn’t do over the past four decades?

                    I use my skills in web development to help them out with several state party websites, and much more. So happy I have things to be proud of instead of being you.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re voting third party in a First Past the Post election structure, so you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the specific incarnation of democracy you exist within.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              That doesn’t mean it works well in those countries. Plus, there are other differences to how their governments are structured.

                • zeppo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Voting in primaries for people who support it would help. In general elections, how will that help since they can’t get elected?