Tesla must face fraud suit for claiming its cars could fully drive themselves - eviltoast
  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”

    The whole thread is about Musk claiming in 2019 that Tesla has FSD working NOW, that could drive the car from a parking lot on the other side of the country (USA) and pick you up in a parking lot where you are. AND that it could drive more safely than a human being.
    I am not interested in the slightest whether it’s 50% or 90% there now, the fact is the claim was made first in 2016, that Tesla would have it ready NEXT YEAR, and in 2019 he claimed it was ready NOW! And it’s STILL not ready!!

    So what is it about Musks claims being false you don’t understand?

    I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”.

    That’s decidedly false, because you yourself wrote:

    It can do that now.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      The whole thread is about Musk claiming in 2019 that Tesla has FSD working NOW

      From the article:

      (1) representations that Tesla vehicles have the hardware needed for full self-driving capability and, (2) representations that a Tesla car would be able to drive itself cross-country in the coming year.

      So not only are you clearly emotionally invested here but you’re also being dishonest about the claims that have been made. I don’t think there’s any reason to go further with this.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Oh boy you are tiresome, I wrote the thread, not the post.
        But still the context of “the coming year” Musk claimed Tesla had that NOW in 2019, and it would be made available to consumers in the coming year being 2020. It’s from the exact same presentation.

        Nothing you quote contradicts anything I wrote. It’s just different parts of the same thing, which of course requires background knowledge you evidently don’t have.