Legal scholars increasingly raise constitutional argument that Trump should be barred from presidency - eviltoast

Prominent conservative legal scholars are increasingly raising a constitutional argument that 2024 Republican candidate Donald Trump should be barred from the presidency because of his actions to overturn the previous presidential election result.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That too, but note that it doesn’t say “convicted”. There is no requirement for conviction.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So I can just accuse somebody and they’re barred from running?

      A conviction means a process was followed, evidence was weighed, arguments pro and con were considered.