Israel Briefs US on Plan for 'Ethnic Cleansing' of Rafah - eviltoast
Israel Briefs US on Plan for 'Ethnic Cleansing' of Rafah | Common Dreams
www.commondreams.org
"A military invasion in Rafah would be CATASTROPHIC... There can be no more 'evacuations.' There is no safe place to go," said Oxfam, calling for an immediate cease-fire.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15001340

“Such an invasion could lead to horrific massacres and raise scenarios of a second Nakba,” the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights said recently. “After 200 days of horrific genocidal acts in Gaza, the real objectives of the attack are the continuation of the 76-year-long ongoing Nakba and the erasure and genocidal destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Israel is laying the groundwork to fulfill its settler-colonial plan of colonizing Gaza.”

Human rights defenders have warned that Israel may ultimately seek to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians as possible from Gaza.

  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    8 months ago

    Just making sure I understand this correctly.

    What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

    And what the other poster is saying is that this is especially acceptable as its the side they agree with?

    And this is ok?

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
      52·
      8 months ago

      What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

      To a greater or lesser degree, all news orgs do this.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldEnglish
        32·
        8 months ago

        Yes, most organizations lean one way or another.

        The issue I’ve got is that this discussion seems to be saying that it should be celebrated as the be all and end all of this conflict, that you should only be looking at organizations that support your view, and that you shouldn’t look into what bias your organizations is pushing without further analysis and understanding.

        Effectively, that it’s more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
          22·
          8 months ago

          Effectively, that it’s more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

          Who is saying that though? I’m certainly not.