Supreme Court rejects Elon Musk over agreement with SEC to vet social media posts - eviltoast
  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 months ago

    Removing the requirements for a lawyer to review his tweets would immediately result in him getting hit even harder by the SEC because he has an inability to keep his cock holster shut.
    He wouldn’t be able to help himself and he would immediately start fucking with Tesla stock again, landing him in legal trouble.
    If it wasn’t likely to ruin the lives of Tesla shareholders by making the stock unstable I would say let him do it.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tesla shareholders are gambling addicts that will lose their money sooner or later anyway. Tesla is not worth more than all the rest of the car industry put together, and the bubble will burst at some point.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The rest of the car industry caught up, so Tesla’s market cap is no longer more than the rest of the car industry put together.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          On the other hand, had any other company gave the Q1 earnings call that Tesla gave last week their stock would have cratered.

          • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Which is exactly why Musk is agitating to get the lawyer requirement dropped.
            The whole reason why he got in that situation in the first place is because he was running his mouth about having enough money to take Tesla private, he didn’t, But the stock value went through the roof anyway.