Netflix: Profits soar after password sharing crackdown - eviltoast

Netflix says its profits have soared in the first three months of this year, partly thanks to a crackdown on password sharing.

The streaming giant said it added 9.3 million customers in the first quarter, bringing its total number of subscribers to almost 270 million.

The company also said its profits in the first quarter jumped to more than $2.3bn (£1.85bn).

But the firm will stop reporting key subscriber numbers from next year.

Some investors saw its unexpected decision to stop reporting subscriber numbers as a sign that Netflix’s wave of customer growth may be coming to an end.

Simon Gallagher, a former Netflix director and now principal of entertainment investment firm SPG Global, told the BBC’s Today programme that while the numbers indicated a “very, very strong performance” this might not last.

    • comrade19@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 months ago

      I heard investors need stocks to forever go up and for that to happen companies need to keep doing things like this. They cant just leave things as they are or something

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not only investors. Everyone needs stocks to forever go up. We’re kind of fucked, because once it becomes apparent that the infinite market growth isn’t possible and we reach a theoretical ceiling of stock market, the world and economy will probably be in serious shit.

        I’ve tried looking for some articles or papers about what would actually happen and couldn’t find any, but our society right now is kind of based on that premise, and once it stops it’s going to be a problem. Mostly for the ordinary people, though. And of course, caused entirely by the greedy investors struggling to figure out how to keep milking the cow. Fuck capitalism.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          A lot of pensions will be fucked that heavily invested in stocks, but aside from that, the world will be fine. You 100% don’t need stocks in order for companies to thrive. Japan has had a poor stock market for the past 30 years, but there’s still a ton of companies and businesses that do just fine, there. There’s also tons of places in the US as well that aren’t publicly traded. Hobby Lobby, Quik Trip, Valve, SpaceX, Hy-Vee, just to name a few multi billion dollar companies.

          The quickly rising stock market also hasn’t always been like it has been since the 1980’s. It went 18 years running more or less completely flat before that, and society didn’t collapse. Nearly two decades of no growth whatsoever.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Basically all 401ks in the US rely on stocks. And basically everyone’s retirement (who doesn’t have a pension, which is fewer and fewer jobs) relies on 401ks.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              And if the market goes back to running flat, the 401k’s won’t shrink. They just won’t gain interest. “Oh no”.

              Sure, it sucks, but it isn’t the end of the world, and if stocks run flat and 401ks run flat, then inflation should be running flat as well. It could bankrupt some companies and screw some people over if their retirements are not 401ks and are instead in company stock and stock options, but if you took nothing but stock options and didn’t go with a traditional 401k or other savings, than that’s a large risk you took on yourself.

              401k’s are federally protected under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act and assure that your contributions are protected right down to the month and no angry creditors or company bankruptcy can go after that money.

              That isn’t to say a market crash won’t cause your 401k to go down, but the market won’t “crash” by hitting a ceiling, and most 401ks aren’t just in the US stock market. They’re diversified among foreign and domestic stuff, and not just stock markets, so even a large crash isn’t going to wipe out anyone’s 401k. Just reduce it by maybe 20% or less, depending on options you’ve chosen with your 401k.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s exactly right. In fact, they legally have to do what they think will be good for the investors/ stock holders.

        It’s one of the reasons why Valve has managed to be a loved company for decades. It’s a private company, so they don’t have to answer for monetarily poor decisions and are free to do what they’d like. It also means things could change if management changes hands.

        • Lukewarm_Tea@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          I am also an investor. If the socks don’t go up I get a rash, shortness of breath and this feeling of inescapable doom. So unless you want to be a murderer I suggest you help me keep the stonks going up.

      • Lukewarm_Tea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        One day the companies will figure out how to charge infinite money for no product or service. Then capitalism will be satisfied and the game will be won.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I thought this might be the case for insurance companies once self driving cars displace manually driven cars entirely.

          Collect all the premiums, pay out very rarely since these systems have the potential to be a lot safer in general than human drivers. Possibly with the exception of Tesla since Musk’s decision to not have Lidar severely constrains their system’s ability to function properly.