Plans for Saudi Arabia’s linear city cut from 170km to 2.4km - eviltoast

Saudi Arabia’s wildly ambitious plan to build 500m tall, mirrored, 170km long parallel skyscrapers, forming a 1.5M population desert city has been curtailed to 2.4km long.

The news was broken by the financial news publication Bloomberg, which said that Saudi Arabia’s government had “scaled back its medium-term ambitions” for Neom, of which The Line is the most significant sub-project.

The Saudi government had hoped to have 1.5M residents living in The Line by 2030, but this has been scaled back to fewer than 300,000, according to the report. It is unclear how it intends to house a higher concentration of people considering the proposed length (and therefore area) has been massively slashed.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Like I said- if you need to get to the other side of a normal city, you can avoid congestion by taking a different route.

          In a linear city, there is only one route. If there is a traffic jam or a train derailment in a linear city, there are no alternative routes. Not even for an ambulance.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I would assume you have two routes, one either side, both directions for this exact reason.

            If anything it will be more reliable and cost effective as every mass transit can be used by anyone.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s very easy for one truck crash to block off both directions of a road. Even a very wide road. I know because I’ve experienced it.

              I’m really not sure why you don’t understand why having multiple alternate routes from A to B would be a big advantage.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Im saying two separate highways, one on either side rather than two directions next to each other.

                I live in a city full of peninsulas and harbours - well aware how much it sucks having one way in and out of places. The difference is that they were never planned and designed for current volumes, vehicles and logistics - this can be.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So two truck accidents could clog up the entire city. Again, seems like having alternate routes would be an advantage.

                  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    And three separate incidents that also breach both lanes, cant be cleared quickly and happen at the same time can block three.