Missouri executes Brian Dorsey for 2006 double murder after mercy bid backed by 72 correctional officers - eviltoast

The state of Missouri on Tuesday executed Brian Dorsey for the 2006 murders of his cousin, Sarah Bonnie, and her husband, Benjamin Bonnie, after an effort to have his life spared failed in recent days.

Dorsey’s time of death was recorded as 6:11 p.m, the Missouri Department of Corrections said in a news release. The method of execution was lethal injection, Karen Pojmann, a spokesperson for the department, said at a news conference, adding it “went smoothly, no problems.”

The execution of Dorsey, 52, occurred hours after the US Supreme Court declined to intervene and about a day after Missouri’s Republican governor denied clemency, rejecting the inmate’s petition – backed by more than 70 correctional officers and others – for a commutation of his sentence to life in prison.

Dorsey and his attorneys cited his remorse, his rehabilitation while behind bars and his representation at trial by attorneys who allegedly had a “financial conflict of interest” as reasons he should not be put to death. But those arguments were insufficient to convince Gov. Mike Parson, who said in a statement carrying out Dorsey’s sentence “would deliver justice and provide closure.”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They generally do so when they’re older than the people who get executed for the same accused crime. Meaning there’s a chance they’ll have a life outside of prison if they’re innocent.

      Again, you can’t unkill someone. You can, however, not intentionally kill them.

      • sepulcher@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Meaning there’s a chance they’ll have a life outside of prison if they’re innocent.

        Yeah, but what about those who don’t get that chance?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              You really don’t understand the difference between an innocent person potentially dying in prison and an innocent person definitely dying in prison?

              • sepulcher@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Of course I do. The end result is still the same for those who die in prison.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Again- potential vs. definite. Why is potential just as bad as definite to you?

                  There’s the potential you will get hit by a car every time you walk down the street. Isn’t that potential better than someone intentionally driving into you?

                  • sepulcher@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    Because either way an innocent person is losing their life because of the state.

                    I just wanted you to admit that it’s acceptable to imprison potentially innocent people for life but it’s not okay to execute them, which you did.