Women-only social media app Giggle for Girls taken to court by transgender woman Roxanne Tickle after her account was restricted - eviltoast
  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app’s founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What’s next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app’s founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle’s photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app’s full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s silly and you know it. She still had one to begin with. That’s like saying “if a dude cuts off his penis, he’s no longer a dude!”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I define a woman as a female who has a uterus

      Your definition. Has a uterus. You said nothing about a female who had a uterus.

      And you haven’t defined female.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not my fault that your definition excluded women who had a uterus at one time but didn’t later.

          How about women who have two X chromosomes but were born without a uterus? Not women?

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh brother…let’s just agree to disagree…it’s obvious what side of the issue you’re on…

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              The side where scientific definitions of women include things like women with two X chromosomes but no uterus?