‘Simply mind-boggling’: world record temperature jump in Antarctic raises fears of catastrophe - eviltoast

An unprecedented leap of 38.5C in the coldest place on Earth is a harbinger of a disaster for humans and the local ecosystem

On 18 March, 2022, scientists at the Concordia research station on the east Antarctic plateau documented a remarkable event. They recorded the largest jump in temperature ever measured at a meteorological centre on Earth. According to their instruments, the region that day experienced a rise of 38.5C above its seasonal average: a world record.

This startling leap – in the coldest place on the planet – left polar researchers struggling for words to describe it. “It is simply mind-boggling,” said Prof Michael Meredith, science leader at the British Antarctic Survey. “In sub-zero temperatures such a massive leap is tolerable but if we had a 40C rise in the UK now that would take temperatures for a spring day to over 50C – and that would be deadly for the population.”

This amazement was shared by glaciologist Prof Martin Siegert, of the University of Exeter. “No one in our community thought that anything like this could ever happen. It is extraordinary and a real concern,” he told the Observer. “We are now having to wrestle with something that is completely unprecedented.”

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t say this to minimize global warming or climate change or anything like that…

    But the entire premise of the fear that this article in particular drives is that temperature is scalar, which it is not.

    The claim that a 40° C jump in Sub-Zero temperatures is tolerable, but wouldn’t be in the UK or whatever they’re saying in this article… That’s nonsense. Climate change is plenty terrifying. We don’t need to make shit up to make it scarier.

    30° F is not half the temperature of 60° F. Arise in 10° F from 100° F is not the same as a 10° raise from zero degrees Fahrenheit. It’s just not an accurate way to talk about temperature. Temperature is not scalar.

    • HorseChandelier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Temperature is not scalar

      Messers Rankine, Kelvin and even Fahrenheit would beg to differ… Temperature is scalar, however it’s effects on living things is generally not mostly owing to chemistry.

      The claim that a 40° C jump in Sub-Zero temperatures is tolerable, but wouldn’t be in the UK or whatever they’re saying in this article… That’s nonsense

      Au contraire my dear fellow. For a human, the article is entirely correct. A rise of 40° C in a particularly cold place is indeed tolerable for a human. A similar rise in, say, the UK today would put the temperature at 52° C - hotter than Death Valley on a well above average day and considerably less tolerable.

      Of course a single recorded rise in temperature isn’t a good indication of climate…

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Messrs., with the period. It’s the plural of Mr.

        No, it doesn’t make sense, that’s part of why nobody uses it.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wasn’t saying the 40 c jump was an inaccurate statement, I was saying it wasn’t a meaningful one.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      yeas 30 degress is not half of 60 because zero is just an arbitrary placement but temperature is most definately scalar. 10 degrees higher at 100 is the same as 0 degrees the reason in everything except of kelvin and its ilk the halving does not work is because the zero point is not truly zero, not because the difference in degrees are different at any point in the scale.