New moral panic dropped... - eviltoast
    • reliv3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      What flavor of MAGA kool-aid you be sipping? Let me give you some nutrition.

      Before DEI: two candidates, A and B, are equally qualified for a job. Candidate A is a straight white male. Candidate B is woman, person of color, or a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Result: Candidate A will get hired.

      With DEI: two candidates, A and B, are equally qualified for a job. Candidate A is a straight white male. Candidate B is woman, person of color, or a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Result: Candidate B might get hired.

        • formergijoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Barnett said he found discarded sharp metal shavings near electrical systems for the flight controls at Boeing’s factory in South Carolina,” darn diversity metal shavings! “Barnett told the BBC that he became aware of faulty installation of the aircraft’s oxygen systems, which could deprive some breathing masks of oxygen in the event of an emergency.” Darn diverse oxygen systems! Sauce

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  For all the Newsweek agitprop, it should be noted that “Whiteness” isn’t clearly defined. Its a political definition that can include East Indians and exclude Poles and the Irish, depending on who is writing the law.

                  In a city like NY, with a very long and tawdry record on race politics, it can get confusing for a person wandering through a history exhibit to understand how and why certain ethnic cohorts gain or lose their “White” qualifier. So a museum establishing some kind of historically informed guideline to clarify can be helpful. Particularly when so much of their audience may be themselves or have relatives in their own living history who did not qualify as they do today.

                  • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I found it funny that when applying for jobs with the NYC government, Italians were not actually considered white. They were included in the affirmative action policies with other minorities. Definitely shows how the category of whiteness can evolve.

            • yuriy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              This is such a stretch, and you’re only doing it so you can be a bigot.

              When bad things happen most people will look for a cause or explanation instead of just blaming black people and women.

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                you’re only doing it so you can be a bigot.

                Objection: that’s entirely unproven and merely your opinion.

                When bad things happen most people will look for a cause or explanation instead of just blaming black people and women.

                That’s precisely what I’m doing. And I’m not even saying that is WAS black people or women, just that it looks rather likely.

                I mean, it IS possible that perhaps, maybe, SOMETIMES they’re at fault? Or is it always straight white men that are to blame?

                • yuriy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It only “looks rather likely” from the perspective of a racist. I would look to an explanation that doesn’t require conspiracy theory levels of mental gymnastics.

                  I saw the maga crowd bitching about woke politics being to blame when the Key Bridge collapsed, but I didn’t think they genuinely believed something so fucking braindead. Apparently I was wrong!

                  Why don’t you prove your ingenius “women of color saboteurs” theory? Maybe with something a little more substantial then “you don’t know where those metal shavings came from, so it’s probably woke politics.” For all the evidence you’ve presented, those metal shavings may as well have spontaneously generated.

                  Also if you absolutely insist on keeping up the whole racism thing, you should expect people to be rather curt with you, if not outright hostile. Wild as it is, kind society doesn’t take kindly to racists.

                  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Okay, then what’s your explanation for this? And stay on topic please, the Key Bridge incident has nothing at all to do with Boeing.

        • waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Lmao how fucking retarded do you have to be to think that the quality problems at Boeing are a result of hiring practices? Holy fuck dude don’t forget to breathe.

        • ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          You think Boing airplanes are falling apart because of some women and black people having worked on them? I want you to know that my 9 year old niece and I are currently laughing at you.

        • seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Incorrect. He was assassinated because he blew the whistle on management cutting corners with QA. Nothing to do with DEI hiring practices. I think you dropped this white hood…

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Ah yes, that certainly is completely unrelated to management also trying to meet their DEI goals at the same time. Pure coincidence these two things happened at the same time.

            • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              A million things were happening at the same time in a company of that size and complexity. So yeah until you can prove a connection (which you haven’t even attempted to do) the rational conclusion is coincidence. You’re a rational person, right?

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                I obviously cannot prove a direct connection, that would require actual evidence like a work log or a video of the person doing it. Since I neither work there nor with the police I am clearly not in any position to obtain such evidence. If you’re expecting such things from a forum discussion, you’re at the wrong address. You’re looking for the court room.

                But absence of proof isn’t proof of absence either, so your insistence that these things have nothing to do with each other is just as unproven as my conjecture.

                • dezvous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Translation: “I can’t prove anything so I’m gonna blame minorities for problems until someone provides real evidence (evidence which I will ignore and continue blaming minorities)”

                  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    You haven’t provided any evidence that would disprove my reasoning, you are merely assuming that I would ignore it.

                  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I could ask you the same. You haven’t proven anything either, you’re just bashing me for having an unpopular opinion.

                • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  There are an infinite number of theories that cannot be proven or disproven. In the absence of any causal evidence your assertion remains irrational. For example I can’t prove you’re not a pedophile. You cant provide me with evidence that disproves you being a pedophile. Yet if I were to make a random assumption that you’re a pedophile remains, that would be irrational.

                  But absence of proof isn’t proof of absence either, so your insistence that these things have nothing to do with each other is just as unproven as my conjecture.

                  I made no such insistence. I am pointing out that there is no reason to believe those things are connected. There are and infinite uinebr of potentially connected things. Believing in any of them without evidence is irrational. Since you’re unable to even begin to provide any causal link, you are being irrational.

                  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The evidence I have provided is circumstantial, not causal, I admit that, but it’s certainly better than no evidence at all.

                    Meanwhile, you’re not providing ANY evidence whatsoever, all you’re doing is reminding me of something I already know and have already admitted.

                    To put it in simpler terms, what we have is a crime scene and someone’s footprints leading towards and away from it. Does that mean that person did it? No, because we’re missing a murder weapon with their fingerprints on it as well. But I’d say it certainly merits further investigation. Meanwhile, you’re just burying your head in the sand because you’re friends with the suspect and don’t want to see them in jail, but you can’t give them an alibi and you don’t have any proof of their innocence.

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Funny how quickly people forget.

          We didn’t forget, we just never invented this crazy fantasy in our heads in the first place.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          As an aerospace engineer: ahahahahah. Not. Take your insecurities elsewhere. Preferably to a therapist, instead of externalizing your self-hatred.

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t hate myself. I don’t even hate you or any of the other people giving my shit. You are merely projecting and you should probably take your own advice.

        • reliv3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Even with DEI practices, white straight males still hold a strong majority of the upper management positions; so whenever you hear about the evils of DEI while indulging in your daily Fox News, Daily Wire, or Newsmax, remember that the buck stops with some white straight males. Hence why blaming DEI for a decrease in quality makes no logical sense.

          Most doctors are still straight white males. Most airline pilots are still straight white males. Most of the people who are making major company decisions are still straight white males.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Boeing literally had a guy murdered for blowing the whistle on rampant DEI

          DEI is when you outsource to the lowest bidder

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Normally, companies don’t want to reduce labor costs. But with DEI, we can trick them into it?

              Was the problem with McDonald Douglas also the number of PoCs on payroll?

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, companies ALWAYS want to reduce labor costs, but normally we hate them for it. With DEI, we’re giving them a way they can make it socially acceptable.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  normally we hate them for it.

                  Who is “we”? I’ve seen far too many folks survive a round of layoffs with a shit eating grin, because they like who got cut.

                  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Uh, IDK, have you spent any time at all on Lemmy? Every day it’s company X did this horrible thing, company Y did that horrible thing, capitalism bad, corporations evil. Except when it comes to DEI, then suddenly everyone jumps to defend a megacorporation who seemingly literally just had a guy murdered for trying to speak out about quality control issues that may have lead to actual life-threatening accidents because it might be racist.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Ah yes, brilliant argument. You have completely convinced me of the error of my ways. /s

        • seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          No one can convince you of anything. You’re clearly set in your opinion, which is 100% incorrect. Your ability to parse new information is already shut down by your stubborn attachment to the narrative that white people are being oppressed.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          You haven’t made a rational argument so why are you whining when you don’t get rational answers? Make an argument backed by actual evidence.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I taught engineering courses for 10 years and have worked in the field longer than that, and I can assure you there is rarely a such thing as a “most competent person for the job.” Especially once you get to the highest levels of performance.

      I can also assure you that teams which are allowed to stay familiar and homogeneous (eg, a bunch of bros who live together) and are never pushed to include diversity of experience and background rarely achieve anything notable compared to teams who are pushed beyond their cultural comfort zones. Anecdotally, the effect could not be more clear, and there’s plenty of peer reviewed literature documenting this.

      Tl;Dr - mechanical diversity has intrinsic value. Read a book

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      on steroids

      HR: “Hey, just for our records, are you a minority?”

      Me: “I’m 1/64th Cherokee”

      HR: “Close enough!”

      Corporate PR Department: “We are a Majority First Nations run business.”