Democrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take notice - eviltoast
  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This has been on my mind every time the DNC tries to position themselves as a party for the people. As far as I’m concerned, they showed their hand, and apparently they thought no one would notice.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There is nowhere to run.

      Democrats = the party of the rich
      Republicans = the party of the rich
      MAGA = the grift of the rich

      We’re going to be voting for the lesser evil for at least a few more cycles. Doesn’t mean it’s a good idea not to vote though.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        We can be so much more creative than that. There are mountains of actions we can take in addition to voting to change things.

        Why should we accept that the only people we can vote for are evil? Every US election has been this way for at least 20 years now. One less than the other everytime (depending on perspective) but if the only options are widely seen as evil, we must do something to change this.

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          We don’t have to accept it—that’s what primaries are for. But there are people out there who lose the primary and then they just don’t vote—that is the time people should choose the lesser of two evils. Simply not voting is just giving up the tiny shred of control you actually have.

          Of course, if you feel strongly about a candidate, it is a good idea to make calls, put up signs, or anything else to help them win. But, as we saw with Bernie, even a massive grassroots effort isn’t always enough.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            We don’t have to accept it—that’s what primaries are for. But there are people out there who lose the primary and then they just don’t vote—that is the time people should choose the lesser of two evils.

            No. They should not. Stop lecturing people who are fighting something better and start lecturing the people voting for absolute trash in the primaries.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      if some people here are any indication, there are a bunch of people who didnt actually notice.