Russia and China Veto U.S.-Led Cease-Fire Resolution at U.N. - eviltoast

Edit: It looks like the argument here is that the US is not calling for an instant ceasefire, but instead saying that one is very important to have. China and Russia say it should be immediate. The US also tied it to hostage talks.

Another resolution is in the works to call for an immediate ceasefire, but the US is expected to veto it because they believe it could endanger hostage talks.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Until Israel is forced to follow the UN’s original intention and Hamas is completely dismantled, there will be no peace in the ME.

    Why is only one of these getting dismantled?

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because I believe Israel should exist in conjunction with Palestinian lands.

      Just my opinion.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Israel the modern state shouldn’t exist, not at all. It’s an Apartheid settler colonialist state and much more of a terrorist organization than Hamas. Now whether Palestine should be partitioned with one part given to Jews that’s a different debate, but even then that should be a new state built from the ground up with an actually fair constitution and international supervision. I say even then because I believe one democratic state is a lot better than two states that are likely to go to war with each other and much more liable to become Apartheid states.