Just a little friendly compromise, what could go wrong? - eviltoast
  • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    To be fair Ukraine have said they intend to fight until the borders are back to pre-war which includes Crimea.

    Compromise can be met with Crimea.

    Edit: can someone who downvotes explain why you disagree?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      About the only bit that could be compromised on. Crimea isn’t going to be retaken by an invasion force, unless the whole Russian military collapses in on itself.

      However, I would note that effectively sieging Crimea is very viable considering the poor state of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea and Crimea’s reliance on supply from the rest of Russia. However, that would require most Ukrainian land taken during the initial invasion to be reclaimed first.

      • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yep most definitely, reclaiming the mainland is step one and no compromises should be made there. The decision on the remaining bloodshed and cost required to retake crimea from 2014 annexation can be evaluated at that point.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      Crimea WAS the compromise. In 2014. The orange revolution was the compromise in 2004.

      The disagreement is with the idea that compromise would even result in a real peace. The Russia would stop actively working to dismantle the Ukrainian state. It’s not even just Ukraine. Georgia was invaded in 2008.

      At this point, it’s just appeasement. And appeasement doesn’t work.