What do you think is the best solution to having the same named communities on different instances? - eviltoast

We should implement this as whenever I wish to browse (for example) technology@lemmy.world I have to go to there, and whenever I wish to browse technology@kbin.social I have to go there. Would it be possible to implement it in kbin/lemmy’s code to make it easier to browse all?

    • Psiczar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So subscribe to half a dozen technology@… subs? I guess we can but surely in the long term there is a better way to merge the content of identically named subs so you subscribe to 1 and get the content of all of the others? If the fediverse is going to thrive and expand they need to fix it for the average user who doesn’t understand how all this works. Tags would be the best way, to automate it.

      • MiddleKnight@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Identically named does not imply identical. Could be totally different communities with the same name. Or there could be subtle but important differences.

        Likewise differently named does not imply that two communities are not essentially the same.

        Having some form of grouping could be an idea that might be useful to some. I imagine different people would like it to function in different ways.

        But it is entirely orthogonal to naming. At the end of the day abc@instance1 is a different name than abc@instance2.