California Cop Who Shot 18-Year-Old Had His Bodycam Off, But Surveillance Footage Captured Him Shooting Suspect in the Back as He Fled - eviltoast
  • MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You have no clue what you are talking about.

    Even if you would come up with some gopros in fancy casing, 8-9h/day of uncompressed, 1080p video that has to be hosted “in the cloud” (and transferred via 4g or the) for each and every cop adds up pretty quickly.

    And don’t mind that they surely find every way possible to break them, so take them as basically consumables along with the batteries and the casings…

    Do you have any idea how everything cops use is expensive, because it’s “for law enforcement”?

    60k$/yr is negligible in a department’s budget and especially for the value it adds (even with POS cops).

    EDIT: the videos are most certainly compressed! But my argument is that it still remains pretty large files to upload and host.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      We’re talking ~10TB of video data a year per officer, for relatively high bitrate 8Mb/s video. Assuming there’s a solid 10 hours a day of footage, and they’re working 5 days a week.

      For a small town department of say 6. That’s 60TB/y.

      If you use even the most expensive large storage provider (AWS S3), that’s ~$19k/y in storage costs. If you use a more appropriate one for encrypted bulk storage like Backblaze, that’s a measly ~$5k/y.

      So, per officer. You have ~$800/y (ceilinged to be liberal with the cost) per year, compounding, for storage.

      In either case you are grossly overestimating storage costs.

      4G transmission costs are going to be expensive, but they shouldn’t be much more expensive than the storage costs, data transfer is relatively cheap when you’re paying for business services.