A top auto safety group tested 14 partial automated systems — only one passed - eviltoast
  • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Linking to the actual test so you don’t have to visit the verge.

    What is interesting to me that many failed on the driver monitoring side which to me as a consumer (not a traffic authority) is probably actually a pro not a con. I don’t want my car insessantly beeping at me for dumb reasons. I wouldn’t intend to use these systems without attention but stricter controls will also mean more false positives.

    By this logic Lexus, Volvo, Nissan, Mercedes, and even Ford seem great (somewhat depending on the model of the car).

    Whats also funny is that the Tesla utterly failed almost all categories except the lane change (and passed emergency). But it can’t even do that unless you’re willing to pay them extra thousands of dollars for the software unlock.

    • GingeyBook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Am I blind? What on earth does A M P and G mean

      Edit:

      A system may be assigned a rating of good, acceptable, marginal or poor

      The chart could really use a legend included with it

    • Fermion@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I rented a Nissan that would scream at you for deviating from a lane. I couldn’t turn it off fast enough. Driving on a small winding road was constant false positives. Even on the highways, faded and repainted lines was throwing false positives. It was more of a distraction than a help. When driving in an unfamiliar city I didn’t need the car distracting me with its disfunction.

      Turning it off was buried deep in a menu that was not convenient to find. There would be no way to quickly or safely toggle it on and off as conditions vary.

    • WxFisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      For me as the driver of not one of these cars, I think the driver monitoring and sheeting is perhaps one of the most important parts of these systems. I 100% want your car to scream at you for not paying attention while use the driver assist features because it’s such a common and easy thing to do (if it works 99 times without issues, human nature is to assume it will work that 100th time, so checking that email from work real quick is probably fine). When the consequences of a driver failing to post attention while using these systems is potentially other people dying in a horrific crash, your discomfort at an alert because you happen to be a perfect driver that never does other things in the car while driving doesn’t matter.

      • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s fine, I agree it makes the roads safer, but it won’t make me buy a car that screams at me

    • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also some of these cars are from 2021. I imagine there can be a significant difference between these and newer models.

      I wonder how Audi is doing. They had a level 3 car coming out a few years ago now. Haven’t heard of it since…