Moms for Liberty had a chance to explain themselves. It didn't go well. - eviltoast

When confronted with basic questions on “60 Minutes,” the group appeared ill-prepared and stumped and alleged their critics were trying to “marginalize us.”

Since its founding in 2021, the conservative organization Moms for Liberty has billed itself as a champion for “parents’ rights,” pushing campaigns across the country to ban books and the use of pronouns in schools. Their crusade, as my colleague Kiera Butler has reported, often alleges that educators, specifically in public education, are out to “groom” and “indoctrinate” kids.

But what, exactly, does that mean? It doesn’t appear as though Moms for Liberty knows either.

In an interview with 60 Minutes host Scott Pelley that aired on Sunday night, the group’s two co-founders repeatedly struggled to explain their platform beyond empty talking points that have fueled the culture war in schools. They also failed to present facts to back up various claims.

  • tabularasa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is great and all, but I hate the fact that they are even being legitimized to the point of getting on a platform such as 60 minutes.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      How did this legitimize them? They look like idiots to everyone who watched it. This was an opportunity for the public at large to get a view into what these people are like—it didn’t go well for them.

      • Decoy321@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        The person you’re replying to wasn’t saying, in any way, that this interview legitimized them. They were commenting on how the group had already been legitimized by others enough to be worth screentime on 60 minutes in the first place.