Trump's Team 'Literally Popping Champagne' Over Supreme Court Taking Up Immunity Claim - eviltoast

The former president is now highly unlikely to stand trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case before November

The Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a massive victory on Wednesday by agreeing to rule on whether he is immune from prosecution for acts committed while he was president. The court will hear arguments on April 22 and won’t hand down a decision until June — which means it’s unlikely a trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case will commence before the election. If Trump wins the election, he’ll of course appoint an attorney general who will toss the case, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules this summer.

By Wednesday night, Trumpland was celebrating.

“Literally popping champagne right now,” a lawyer close to Donald Trump told Rolling Stone late on Wednesday.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re operating under the reasonable logic of how this is supposed to work. But nothings gone how it’s supposed to work for Trump. He’s had a decade of very public crime and been found guilty in several different ways, but has so far not had any consequences enforced. guilty of rape, tax fraud, defamation, campaign finance violations, and bribery, and so far not a penny, much less jail time.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would argue that the two NY cases have gone exactly as you’d expect. Nothing has happened in them that was particularly unusual. Typical rape case + defamation and a corporate fraud case. All already with judgments.

      And as far as collections go, it’s not like buying groceries. He doesn’t have to pay the full amount all at once (and probably can’t). He does have to front the money if he wants to appeal, though, and all he’s done is file for one. They won’t take it up until he’s paid up.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes. The facts and conduct of the trial were typical, ordinary. I was not saying that rape is typical.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              How many rape cases have you heard of that get special, one-time grace periods to revisit 30 years later?

              ETA: this was not a criminal rape trial, it was a civil one. Jail time was never an option.