The war in Iraq was a mistake for multiple reasons, one of those being the fact that the USA didn’t manage to establish an Iraqi government that was particularly friendly to it.
What does that have to do with the claim that the USA took that gold from Iraq, or the ridiculous implication that taking that gold motivated an invasion that cost about a thousand times more money than it is worth?
A military occupation was established and run by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), which later appointed and granted limited powers to an Iraq Interim Governing Council. Troops for the invasion came primarily from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, but 29 other nations also provided some troops, and there were varying levels of assistance from Japan and other allied countries. Tens of thousands of private security personnel provided protection of infrastructure, facilities and personnel.
Coalition and allied Iraqi forces fought a stronger-than-expected militant Iraqi insurgency, and so the reconstruction of Iraq was slow. In mid-2004, the direct rule of the CPA was ended and a new “sovereign and independent” Interim Government of Iraq assumed the full responsibility and authority of the state. The CPA and the Governing Council were disbanded on 28 June 2004, and a new transitional constitution came into effect.[1]
Sovereignty was transferred to a Governing Council Iraqi interim government led by Iyad Allawi as Iraq’s first post-Saddam prime minister; this government was not allowed to make new laws without the approval of the CPA.
The Iraqi Interim Government was replaced as a result of the elections which took place in January 2005. A period of negotiations by the elected Iraqi National Assembly followed, which culminated on 6 April 2005 with the selection of, among others, Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari and President Jalal Talabani. Prime Minister al-Jaafari led the majority party of the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA), a coalition of the al-Dawa and SCIRI (Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq) parties. Both parties are backed by Tehran, and were banned by Saddam Hussein.
an invasion that cost about a thousand times more money than it is worth?
Ah yes a bribe for the “new government” which was installed by America. This makes it better.
Should they have given it back to Saddam Hussein?
They should have not overthrown the Iraq government in the first place to install their own puppet regime.
The war in Iraq was a mistake for multiple reasons, one of those being the fact that the USA didn’t manage to establish an Iraqi government that was particularly friendly to it.
What does that have to do with the claim that the USA took that gold from Iraq, or the ridiculous implication that taking that gold motivated an invasion that cost about a thousand times more money than it is worth?
Occupation of Iraq (2003–2011)
OPEC disagrees with you.