How does the Vox article dispute the DOJ report I cited?
The reason you won’t answer my question isn’t that it’s irrelevant, it’s because you are unable to admit when you’re wrong and are doubling down with your agenda.
I have no issue admitting when I’m wrong. It was a typo and irrelevant. It’s an official government record.
Since you can’t dispute the facts that the fbi knowingly interfered in election, you focus on something irrelevant to draw attention away from the truth. They fbi has interfered with two elections now. That doesn’t bother you ?
James Comey expressed remorse for his handling of the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
I guess they learned from that and didn’t publicize their investigation into the laptop which five years later hasn’t resulted in any charges or convictions.
What do you think the FBI should have done differently?
It didn’t though. That’s not their job. The government is supposed to be apolitical.
It is concerning you think tampering with elections is OK. It isn’t. The new media should have reported based on their own research as we’ve done with hundreds of years. The fbi is not a “fact” checker. They are law enforcement.
Your question isn’t relevant. As such I’m ignoring it to keep you focused.
What in the letter to the fbi do you find incorrect? Do you think it’s appropriate for the fbi to interfere in an election with lies?
The reason you won’t answer my question isn’t that it’s irrelevant, it’s because you are unable to admit when you’re wrong and are doubling down with your agenda.
I have no issue admitting when I’m wrong. It was a typo and irrelevant. It’s an official government record.
Since you can’t dispute the facts that the fbi knowingly interfered in election, you focus on something irrelevant to draw attention away from the truth. They fbi has interfered with two elections now. That doesn’t bother you ?
James Comey expressed remorse for his handling of the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
I guess they learned from that and didn’t publicize their investigation into the laptop which five years later hasn’t resulted in any charges or convictions.
What do you think the FBI should have done differently?
Not called it Russian misinformation.
What should they have done?
Not called it Russian misinformation
Would you have been okay if they had said that it contains misinformation and left the Russian part out of it?
It didn’t though. That’s not their job. The government is supposed to be apolitical.
It is concerning you think tampering with elections is OK. It isn’t. The new media should have reported based on their own research as we’ve done with hundreds of years. The fbi is not a “fact” checker. They are law enforcement.