Why use immutable Linux ? And which one ? - eviltoast

What are the pros and cons for desktops ? EDIT : Thanks all. I’ll try Silverblue, bazzite and more.

  • Communist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you’re using gnome/kde, I see no reason not to run immutable, the advantages of not being immutable are that you can piece together your system, if you’re running i3/sway/whatever, being able to choose your panel, your launcher, etc actually has value.

    The advantages of immutable are that you’ll never end up with a broken system, you can easily roll back to a not broken one if something does break, and the system is separate from your apps.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was able to break fedora silverblue by messing file permissions in the home directory. Toolbx then stopped working, without which the distro is unusable.

      You can also make chaneges in /etc and similarly ruin your system.

      Just saying they aren’t quite as “unbreakable” as advertised.

      • waitmarks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        all changes in etc are snapshotted with each update so you could just roll back to your previous version and it would fix it.

        I assume you meant you messed up permissions in your home directory, and yes that is pretty much the only place you can permanently mess something up with silverblue.