30-50 Feral Hogs - eviltoast
        • Grumpy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think many math from people generally suggest guys get about 0 to 1 matches per day on median. Though, average is much much higher because top very small percentage of men get a crap ton, even more so than top girls. Whereas girls usually get in teens per day for median.

          • Grumpy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s because they have too many people messaging them. They can’t keep up. They end up being selective once again among the people who did match and invest their time into few while ghosting the rest.

            • Geek_King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I know, still sucks. The current numbers I heard for tinder was 25% women, 75% men. The amount of likes a day the average woman gets must be exhausting. Online dating is just awful now.

  • threeduck@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My understanding is that tinder sorts you into categories of desirability so you’re shown people in your own bracket - I assume so hot people don’t associate the product with ugmos.

    By saying tinder is filled with ugmos kinda tells on yourself, doesn’t it?

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this a new thing? I’ve always had a lot of variety, but haven’t used it in ages.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Na, early on in tinders existence they accidentally emailed people their desirability scores. It’s kinda like an ELO score.

      • potpie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        More and more I feel it’s best to think of software as existing in a quantum state of all possible feature/bug combinations. Between updates that can occur on any facet of the software’s intricacies, algorithm quirks, human interventions, and clandestine beta testing on unsuspecting groups of users, who the fuck knows.