Is it worthwhile capturing personal photos as spatial? - eviltoast

I currently have no use for spatial photos, can’t justify the price of the Vision Pro headset, and really don’t have a reason to have strong motivation.

Looking back at old family photos, I see sepia from my parents, faded from when I was a kid, and low rez/faded even from when my kids were little, looking across that timeline, the march of technology is clear. Older photos are noticeably older (even when not printed).

However I have a phone that can take spatial pictures and has extra storage, and I just had to raise my iCloud storage. Assuming spatial photos and videos becomes commonplace, it will be another noticeable jump in photo technology. Reviewers of the Vision Pro rave about them

Do you think

  • spatial photos will become common/normal, or are just a fad like 3D tv?
  • is there a standard format or is it Apple specific?
  • it’s worth getting a jump on the technology for personal photos, even without a use yet? Presumably I will have a use at such time as I look back on personal photos
  • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Right now it’s only spatial videos, not photos, fyi.

    I am a VR enthusiast, and own a Vision Pro already, so my opinion is obviously biased in its favor.

    That out of the way, being able to take a spatial video on the go and relive it in headset is mind-blowing. Taking videos at concerts and drag shows has been my favorite so far but even just little memories feel grounded.

    I have lots of footage of my dog playing at the beach that makes me wish I had this technology before I lost pets from the past.

    The video format is handled in a way that if you aren’t using a headset it just plays back as 2D video and anything that could play video from your phone before can handle it.

    The only downside is that it is resolution and frame rate limited, so if you really don’t think you ever will view them in a headset then you’re making a trade off for no reason. 1080 at 30 is what it’s captured at.

    For me I never used to take videos or panoramas because I wouldn’t view them again after. This tech makes it so I will and I do, so it’s not a trade off, it’s just a benefit.

    • AA5B@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe I’ll play with it a bit, but I actually don’t take much video because I’d never watch it. “Live Photos” were a perfect feature for me because it give just emotional go movement to look more alive while still being “just a photo” that I might look at