Andrew Tate is a symptom, not the problem’: why young men are turning against feminism - eviltoast

Despite the triggering headline, this is a pretty good article that talks about how younger men are falling for this horseshit

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The question is how do men and women love each other after metoo?

    Sure we can switch the topic.

    fuck off, dont try to love me”.

    What the hell are you talking about? That has nothing to do with feminism and I struggle to understand how you arrived at the conclusion that after metoo women don’t want to be loved anymore. Women don’t want to be raped, harassed and then dismissed when they try to get help. That was the point of metoo.

    how do men and women love eachother after metoo?

    Respecting each other, here I gave you the answer.

    But men are still the old one,

    There are tons of positive role models for men out there that fit feminist bills. From Argagorn in LOTR to Aang in Avatar, if you are interested I can keep on going.

    nd there’s nothing but the old philosophy to answer the question of how do men and women love eachother after metoo.

    Yeah, because as I said metoo was about not being raped, harrassed and not dismissed - some rather basic things for a relationship. What answers do you exactly need?

    And it cannot be either men or women to answer it. It must be discussed and agreed. Because women must like what men will be, and men must accept what women want.

    But that is an individual question. There is no answer for everyone besides - respect others and their boundaries and then anything goes. There is no one archetype of men that all women find attractive and never was.

    Final point: the answer cannot be a negative one. It cannot be “don’t be a dick”. Because after metoo most reasonable men understand that. The question is, if we’re not to be dicks, what will we be? And I’m talking about seduction and romantic relationships here.

    You just misunderstood the answer. Again it’s not about not being a dick, no one cares. It’s about not raping, harassing and than dismissing women. And the answer the left is giving: consent. Make sure the other side is into what ever is going on and than you are free to do what ever you two want.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      So we’re back at square one: you don’t understand, and either you don’t care or you don’t see the problem.

      I guess you’re left blaming men and social networks for turning young men mysoginistic fascists.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, if pushback and arguments is not understanding and not caring in your book. You could also try to explain your opinion, if you believe I misunderstood you. That’s up to you buddy.

        guess you’re left blaming men and social networks for turning young men mysoginistic fascists.

        That is not my opinion at all. Except that social media is defenetly playing a role in spreading populist idea. But there is also an underlying reason for those ideas to become popular in the first place.

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You wrote it yourself, you don’t understand what I’m talking about eventhough I explained at length. It’s not up to me. I explained at length already.

          I understand the statistics the article is talking about. And I think I understand why. If you want to understand, you’ll need to make the effort.

          • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            You wrote it yourself, you don’t understand what I’m talking about eventhough I explained at length. It’s not up to me. I explained at length already.

            No, I wrote that I pushed back and made arguments. It’s your personal assessment, that I didn’t get your point. If you were genuinely interested in a conversation - you would try to understand my point and where the misunderstanding might be.

            I understand the statistics the article is talking about. And I think I understand why. If you want to understand, you’ll need to make the effort.

            And other people have other opinions on why and discuss those opinions. That’s why we are here. You can try making an effort to be understood and try to understand others or just be upset why nobody agrees with you.

            For example you wrote:

            guess you’re left blaming men and social networks for turning young men mysoginistic fascists.

            Wich is clearly misunderstanding of my opinion. So I just corrected you. It’s not that hard.

            • bouh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You only answered one sentence in my whole comment and ignored the meaning of everything else. That’s what I mean. You even started with saying that I was sidetracking the conversation when I was actually refocusing it.

              If you want to make this an actual discussion, write your point instead of making it a quote ping pong.

              • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Sure, if you are interested in my personal opinion I will gladly share. Just to be sure we are on the same page: we are talking about why the new right and conservatives are able to reach young men and where and why progressives fail to do so? Agree or did I miss something?

                  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    We live in a time where everything is changing rapidly, which includes gender roles in society. Those stayed rather stable over longer periods of time, but industrialization and two consecutive world wars changed western societies rather drastically. Women became rather completely independent of men in economical aspects and simultaneously pushed for more rights and participation. But this also changed the relationship dynamic and what women seek in a relationship. While previous generation could look at their parents for role models, newer generation had to come up with their own. At the same time over the last 20 years people (in the west) started to grow up in a less certain and secure world. While at the same time internet arrived and changed a lot of ways we interact with other people, while at the same time providing populist with a perfect tool to reach their audience.

                    So to put it together, we live in a completely different and much more complex world form previous generations. It’s not just gender roles people are struggling with. And that is always a perfect time for populist to come around the corner and provide simple solutions. So populist and conman took on themself to sell the old romantic story of better times long gone by (conveniently their audience wasn’t alive back than, so they don’t know) just with modern tools. And easy answers that are sold in an entertaining way will always find buyers. Especially since it’s pushed by algorithms right down peoples throats.