Labor theory of value - eviltoast

No hate for the middle class. I can’t help but enjoy the irony of people who thought they had solidarity with capital talking like Ned Ludd all of a sudden.

  • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Middle class absolutely needs to work though. They just aren’t complete wage slaves because they have some personal capital to absorb urgent/unplanned expenses and can survive without working for some time. Ultimately they still need to work to survive though

    • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      The GOP defines the middle class as $400k a year. If they make in excess of that, is it coming from work? Are they truly part of the working class living paycheck to paycheck at $400k a year? I don’t think so, but hey who knows.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Working class isn’t defined by being poor and middle class isn’t defined by not having to live paycheck to paycheck. Middle class in general is pretty much a made up difference to to split the working class.

        Working class is very easily defined. If you have to work for a living you’re in the working class. It doesn’t matter if you make 40k, 400k or 4 million as long as it’s coming from your labor. Capitalists don’t have to work, their capital makes them money and they can live off the labor of their workers. If you make 400k regardless of your contribution, then you’re not working class.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        So, according to the GOP, less than 12% of the US population is middle class (much less actually, that statistic is apparently for people making more than 200K a year)