Biden "running out" of patience with Bibi as Gaza war hits 100 days - eviltoast

President Biden and other senior U.S. officials are becoming increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his rejection of most of the administration’s recent requests related to the war in Gaza, four U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the issue told Axios.

Why it matters: Since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack 100 days ago, Biden has given Israel his full backing, with unprecedented military and diplomatic support, even while taking a political hit from part of his base in an election year. That support has largely continued publicly, but behind the scenes, there are growing signs that Biden is losing his patience, the U.S. officials said.

  • “The situation sucks and we are stuck. The president’s patience is running out,” one U.S. official told Axios.
  • “At every juncture, Netanyahu has given Biden the finger,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who has been in close contact with U.S. officials about the war, told Axios. “They are pleading with the Netanyahu coalition, but getting slapped in the face over and over again.”

Behind the scenes: Biden hasn’t spoken to Netanyahu in the 20 days since a tense Dec. 23 call, which a frustrated Biden ended with the words: “This conversation is over.” They had spoken almost every other day in the first two months of the war.

  • Before Biden hung up, Netanyahu had rejected his request that Israel release the Palestinian tax revenues it’s withholding.
  • National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby tried to downplay the decrease in communication, telling reporters on Wednesday that “it doesn’t say anything” about the state of the relationship.
  • But more and more signs of irritation are emerging. “There is immense frustration,” a U.S. official said.
  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It sure it. But then, the most powerful kingmaker in the US is AIPAC, if they withdraw their support of Biden, he will struggle in the presidential race.

    Then the risk of a xenophobic wannabe dictator getting elected is put on the otherside of the scale.

    So if you look at this from a purely US point of view. The tradeoff is brown people half a world away die, vs the US becoming trumplandia with all the vengeance he has promised to bestow on his political rivals.

    So if it was your choice, what would you chose?

    Edit to clarify: yes it’s bizarre US allows PACs, corporations should not be treated as people, the situation is FUBAR.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Almost like money needs to get taken out of politics but not like those who use it to keep their people in power will let that happen

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Our views align on the solution and the hurdles.

        It saddens me that there is no young version of Senator Sanders, he would be good for the US.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Money will never be taken out of politics. It’s the fundamental motivation for politics. No one is out there arguing for anything other than money. If you ask anyone if they want to be ecological and ethical they will say they are being so.

        Now ask if the consequences is their livelihood and changing what they know. They will fight tooth and nail.

        We have a fight based on two sides. But don’t think it’s only morally based. Both sides have financial consequences they are considering while fighting.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      People are going to look back in AIPAC and wonder… how AI got a political action committee before chatgtp 6.0 passed the Turning test.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biden’s approval rating is 33%. AIPAC is of no consequence here - no incumbent in the history of US Federal elections has ever won with such abysmal polls in an election year. Not once, ever. Biden isn’t going to magically make history here, and his ego telling him he has to do 2 terms instead of allowing for a primary election so democracy can play out is the reason why.

      Then he has the audacity to claim democracy is on the line this year. It’s already gone, America is just in denial about it.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        But his opponent is also unprecedentedly unpopular, so we’re basically in uncharted electoral territory such that the past isn’t necessarily a good guide to the future.

        Anyone who says they know how this all plays out is either a liar or in denial.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Can’t expect them to fight their esteemed colleagues on the other side of the aisle in Washington for things like the basic human decency of healthcare for our people, or to win an election. But if there’s one thing everyone in DC can agree on, it’s that everything wrong is the fault of the leftists! (This is of course despite leftists having virtually 0 power in this regressive, conservative capitalist dystopia in which we live).