Trump Says Civil War Could Have Been 'Negotiated' in Bizarre Iowa Speech - eviltoast

Donald Trump continued his push on Saturday to win the Republican presidential nomination with a pair of caucus rallies in Iowa, beginning at the DMACC Conference Center in Newton and then culminating in Clinton. His speeches come on the third anniversary of Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and a little more than a week before the Republican Iowa caucus commences on Jan. 15.

As for commemorating the solemn anniversary of Jan. 6, Trump lauded the insurrectionists, while labeling some immigrants as “terrorists” and prisoners and gang members. “And terrorists are coming in also. What they’re doing to our country is not — it’s it’s, when you talk about insurrection, what they’re doing? That’s the real deal. That the real deal — not patriotically and peacefully, peacefully and patriotically” he said, contrasting those who rioted as “peaceful” and “patriotic” against immigrants, who the four-time indicted former president continually paints as criminals.

“I’m so attracted to seeing it,” Trump said. “So many mistakes were made. See, there was something I think could have been negotiated to be honest with you. … I was reading something and I said, ‘This is something that could have been negotiated … that was a that was a tough one for our country… If you negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was … but that would have been OK.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe take a break, pal, that tone is unnecessary

    Were literally staring down a second civil war, and everyone is still believing the South’s propaganda from last time…

    So it’s pretty important that people understand why it happened last time, and they’re gonna lie about it next time too.

    It’s not a meaningless argument like is PlayStation better than Xbox.

    It’s worth being upset when 99% of the country doesn’t understand why we had a civil war

    And no matter my “tone” it’ll piss off conservatives because it’s pointing out they lied.

    And it pisses off moderates because it points out how the only other option still wasn’t actively against slavery.

    If the South hasn’t thrown a temper tantrum, it could have taken decades more for slavery to be outlawed, pushing back civil rights and everything.

    “Just do nothing and hope for the best” rarely works out