einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agohappy wild weasel noisesfeddit.deimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1316arrow-down117
arrow-up1299arrow-down1imagehappy wild weasel noisesfeddit.deeinfach_orangensaft@feddit.de to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareGork@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoIs there a legitimate reason why anti-aircraft guns are not within the scope of the 2nd Amendment? Asking for a friend. Not just the small MANPADS, but I’m talking like a full on ZSU Shilka
minus-squareskillissuer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoshilka is full auto, is above certain cutoff (1/2"?) that classifies weapons as “destructive device”, and each round is actually explosive, which is also tightly restricted
Is there a legitimate reason why anti-aircraft guns are not within the scope of the 2nd Amendment? Asking for a friend.
Not just the small MANPADS, but I’m talking like a full on ZSU Shilka
deleted by creator
shilka is full auto, is above certain cutoff (1/2"?) that classifies weapons as “destructive device”, and each round is actually explosive, which is also tightly restricted