Supreme Court sidesteps decision on Trump presidential immunity claim in federal election interference case - eviltoast

FTA:

“The court denied without comment special counsel Jack Smith’s request asking the justices to circumvent the normal appeals court process and quickly decide the question, which looms large in Trump’s prosecution in Washington over allegations of election interference.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m of two lines of thought…

    1. It could mean they’re in the tank for Trump and are intent on delay, delay, delay.

    2. It could mean that they feel a process this important shouldn’t skip steps and they want to see what the appeals court has to say.

    I keep flipping back and forth. :( I wish they had commented.

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think there is historically low trust in the Supreme Court and the entire institution’s power is based on trust (as opposed to the executives’s that’s based on an enormous military) and anything that vaguely looks like taking a side on this could too the balance.

      Roberts has seemed extremely aware of this issue for a long time on more political cases.