California Lt. Governor: ‘Explore Every Legal Option’ To Remove Trump From Ballot - eviltoast
  • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, if a Dem president incites an insurrection against the United States of America to illegally stay in power, I would absolutely support removing them from the ballot.

    Liberals are weak fascist enablers but that take is not it lmfao

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fully agreed, but what if a Dem president is “allegedly” inciting an insurrection? In terms of electoral games, this is really one I would not want to play with the GOP. They will say that Biden is a traitor because he pulled troops from Afghanistan/the border/whatever other BS they can come up with.

      With a conviction I would be fully in favour of removing Trump from the ballot. Without a conviction it’s just too easy for GOP to come up with a BS story. As a warning, many swing states are controlled by GOP.

      • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So you’re reasoning is that we shouldn’t legitimately use the constitutional amendment to bar a criminal insurrectionist from running for president because other criminals may fraudulently use the same amendment in the future?

        “If you legitimately try to stop the criminals with laws, those criminals may use those same laws illegitimately in the future” is not a reason to let them get away with their bullshit.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Far from it, and you are making exactly my point. I think a “criminal insurrectionist” (as in criminally convicted) should be removed from the ballot. Doing this to somebody who is not convicted opens the door to all kinds of shenanigans.

          • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction. In fact, there had not been a conviction in ANY of the instances where the amendment was invoked.