• Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    For example. Reasoning is the same that allows you to listen to the radio: as long as you can hear car horns and emergency vehicles, you can listen to whatever at whatever volume. But you can be found more at fault if you crash into something, in certain cases.

    Anyway, now you know.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The picture literally says that you can still be fined for distracted driving…

      Also, “it doesn’t explicitly say I can’t so it must be legal” is the Donald Trump defense.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, IF an officer determines the device distracted you. That is literally the same ruling as a car radio.

        And because you brought him up, I think the way you won’t admit your error is more like him.

          • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Why did you say:

            The picture literally says that you can still be fined for distracted driving

            When, as I explained, that had nothing to do with legality of earphones?