Russia has lost 87% of troops it had prior to start of Ukraine war, according to US intelligence assessment - eviltoast

Russia has lost a staggering 87 percent of the total number of active-duty ground troops it had prior to launching its invasion of Ukraine and two-thirds of its pre-invasion tanks, a source familiar with a declassified US intelligence assessment provided to Congress told CNN.

Still, despite heavy losses of men and equipment, Russian President Vladimir Putin is determined to push forward as the war approaches its two-year anniversary early next year and US officials are warning that Ukraine remains deeply vulnerable. A highly anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive stagnated through the fall, and US officials believe that Kyiv is unlikely to make any major gains over the coming months.

The assessment, sent to Capitol Hill on Monday, comes as some Republicans have balked at the US providing additional funding for Ukraine and the Biden administration has launched a full-court press to try to get supplemental funding through Congress.

  • lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s because Russian “law enforcement” is actually terror, they do everything for the large part of citizens to be too afraid to even speak up not to mention doing anything.

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      FTFY. ✌🏽

      That’s because Russian “law enforcement” is actually terror, they do everything for the large part of citizens to be too afraid to even speak up not to mention doing anything.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe, but there are at least places where law is virtually non-existent, those places work on the power of customs and traditions not on terror. Not saying that I prefer unwritten laws, that seems too complicated to be realistically used by a large enough society. Also, I personally don’t equate police not held accountable and terror.

        • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago
          1. If you “don’t equate police not held accountable and terror”, you’re white AF.

          2. Law and law enforcement are two entirely different things.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Could you elaborate on the first item?

            The way I see it terror is always directed towards/against something. It’s not just the atrocities committed by someone it’s mainly instigation of fear to blackmail people to act according to someone’s will.

            Uncomtrolled police force leads to it becoming the organized crime itself, to corruption, to overuse of power, and other bad things, but it doesn’t seem to be directed in itself. So this may be an instrument of terror but it doesn’t necessarily imply the terror itself is what I was trying to say.

            • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Terror is not only an active verb. The more insidious and pervasive representation of this is systemic, violent racism by authority figures and the historical lack of justice against said bigotry.

              In practice, police forces are organized crime with a badge. In theory, and I mean in the most fairy tale way possible, they’re shining paladins of virtue. If you’re still gargling that Kool-Aid, no one can help you, but if you want to put down the pitcher, just say the word.