Democrats worry their most loyal voters won’t turn out for Biden in 2024 - eviltoast

Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    you don’t seem to know what harm reduction means. it’s not voting for the architect of the crime bill.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the alternative is worse then yes, it’s voting for the architect of the crime bill. It’s not ideal but it’s still harm reduction.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        harm reduction is accepting that the thing is going to happen (some shitty politician is going to win) and trying to mitigate that harm.

        ie harm reduction in regards to iv drug use is providing safe needles, injection sites, and testing kits.

        dont try to conflate sucking bidens dick with reducing the harm from the government.

        • Chunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Harm reduction is reducing harm. Pretty straight forward.

          If Politician A wants to pass harmful drug laws and Politician B wants to do even worse, then voting for Politician A is harm reduction.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            that is not what harm reduction is and you should stop spreading misinformation along with your bad advice and politics.