Democrats worry their most loyal voters won’t turn out for Biden in 2024 - eviltoast

Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

  • funkless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    one of the biggest issues, in my humble and also arrogant opinion, is that no political party in any English-speaking country, represents any interests of anyone earning under 7 figures. Maybe even 8 figures, and they have 0 interest or motivation in changing that — despite the lip-service both main parties make for it.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct, but no one on the right is advocating for the working class while a decent amount of the left are pro union and pro worker.

      Just because both candidates are bad choices does not mean they are equally as bad. The DNC & RNC decide who is the candidate, let’s be real. Primaries are rigged, so we get “a shit sandwich vs a giant douche” as South Park put it so eloquently.

      • funkless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        not to be too sophist about it - but while I agree party members care — the salient word in my above post is represent.

        it doesn’t matter if the captain doesn’t want you to get shot if the general is telling the private to shoot you.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That tracks, with I think a couple exceptions on the left. As a whole, yes absolutely.

          I might have misread what I perceived to be a false equivalency about both sides being equally bad though.

          Like saying Louie CK and Cosby are the same thing because they both did sexual crimes

          Same same, but different

    • AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It feels like a significant amount of the democratic party really do. There are a few that ruin it but most are behind minimum wage increases, green energy, taxing the rich, better education and health care. They need a majority not a tie