The Guns Were Said to Be Destroyed. Instead, They Were Reborn. - eviltoast

Communities across the U.S. are fueling a secondary arms market by giving seized and surrendered guns to disposal services that destroy one part and resell the rest.

When Flint, Mich., announced in September that 68 assault weapons collected in a gun buyback would be incinerated, the city cited its policy of never reselling firearms.

“Gun violence continues to cause enormous grief and trauma,” said Mayor Sheldon Neeley. “I will not allow our city government to profit from our community’s pain by reselling weapons that can be turned against Flint residents.”

But Flint’s guns were not going to be melted down. Instead, they made their way to a private company that has collected millions of dollars taking firearms from police agencies, destroying a single piece of each weapon stamped with the serial number and selling the rest as nearly complete gun kits. Buyers online can easily replace what’s missing and reconstitute the weapon.

Hundreds of towns and cities have turned to a growing industry that offers to destroy guns used in crimes, surrendered in buybacks or replaced by police force upgrades. But these communities are in fact fueling a secondary arms market, where weapons slated for destruction are recycled into civilian hands, often with no background check required, according to interviews and a review of gun disposal contracts, patent records and online listings for firearms parts.

  • Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I am the authority on my own politics. you can’t tell me I’m not an anarchist.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah but you’re not an authority on everyone else’s, which is what you’re trying to be when you insist that anarchism is compatible with the notion that rights are a fiction.

      Literally no other anarchist will agree with that just on the principle of words having meanings that are generally consistent from user to user.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah but you’re not an authority on everyone else’s, which is what you’re trying to be

        no, I’m not.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        you insist that anarchism is compatible with the notion that rights are a fiction.

        it is

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          First, learn to comment once spambot.

          And second, either you’re a moron or you believe anarchy is just no rules which means yeah you’re still a moron it’s just that you’re also a utopian which is a special kind of moron.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            calling me names doesn’t change whether I’m right and you can’t tell me what to do.