Alfa@lemmy.world to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 1 year agochatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1132arrow-down115
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkchatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comAlfa@lemmy.world to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squarenieceandtows@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThe original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
minus-squareSimpleDev@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoBut it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages. Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is. Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.
The original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
But it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages.
Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is.
Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.