Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised - eviltoast

After a spy camera designed to look like a towel hook was purchased on Amazon and illegally used for months to capture photos of a minor in her private bathroom, Amazon was sued.

The plaintiff—a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia—argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

Amazon hoped the court would dismiss the suit, arguing that the platform wasn’t responsible for the alleged criminal conduct harming the minor. But after nearly eight months deliberating, a judge recently largely denied the tech giant’s motion to dismiss.

Amazon’s biggest problem persuading the judge was seemingly the product descriptions that the platform approved. An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon’s product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera. Text on that product image promoted the spycams, boasting that they “won’t attract attention” because each hook appears to be “a very ordinary hook.”

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Watching the babysitter if you think she’s abusing your kids.

    Monitoring your office if you’re a politician afraid of poisoning.

    Making an OnlyFans of Grandma pooping.

    Lots of legitimate uses if you’re creative enough.

    • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Watching the babysitter if you think she’s abusing your kids. In the bathroom? Cause that’s where towel hooks are.

      Monitoring your office if you’re a politician afraid of poisoning. See above

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        My jokes aside, I absolutely have towel hooks in non bathrooms. It’s turns out there also capable of holding jackets and other things, despite the name.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          And also, the bathroom seems like a prime location for a child abuser to corner a victim.

          Huh. I’m actually swinging very slightly back toward Amazon’s side on this. Only very slightly, though. This is a tricky case.

          • MaximumPower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If you think the baby sitter is abusing your kid, your a moron, why even hire him/her.

            And now you are also recording the babysitter going to the bathroom.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Couldn’t that as easily be a coat hanger or something to hang your keys or bag on? A hook is a hook.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          but once you advertise it as a surreptitious towel hook and show pictures of it being used as a surreptitious towel hook, it becomes not just any kind of hook. one of the use cases proposed by the manufacturer has become manufacturing illegal pornography by setting up a hidden cam in the bathroom.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          they advertised it as a towel hook AND if they used it to hang hats or whatever it could block the camera. I think its fair to say this is a very creepy camera.

    • Kaity@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Deterrence is always preferable. Clear monitoring may stop crimes in addition to capturing wanton disregard. A disguised bathroom cam is clearly designed to capture illegal footage. It isn’t a deterrent to crime, it’s a tool to commit it. Spy cams in general are sleazy and disgusting.

      Even a nanny cam, despite the clearly just intentions, allow a crime to happen more so than clear security cameras and can be used for less lawful things due to their design.