Tesla loses legal action in Sweden as dispute with Nordic unions escalates - eviltoast
  • FragrantOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    11 months ago

    Musk said last week: “I disagree with the idea of unions. I just don’t like anything which creates a lords-and-peasants kind of thing.”

    What a colossal twat.

        • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re definitely not! But you do have backup from Danish unions. Solidarity is how we’ll bring down this… I lack words to describe him, the Danish term would be “selvfed”, meaning that you consider yourself cooler than anyone else does. I asked Google to translate, and it came back with “smug”, which doesn’t really cover it. Then I asked Google to describe Musk in one word, and it came back with a post from LinkedIn that pretty much used the antonyms for what I was trying to find, namely “genius, futurist, innovator, and entrepreneur”

          Fuck that MuskyBoi and his feudal aspirations.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah as you probably could see I was trying to get multiple Scandinavian laughs in one.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Tesla has lost a legal action against Sweden’s postal service as a dispute with Nordic trade unions escalates.

    A Swedish court said on Thursday that PostNord did not, for the time being, need to deliver licence plates to the electric carmaker that were being blocked by the postal service’s workers, in the latest twist in a battle over collective bargaining agreements.

    A large Danish pension fund on Wednesday said it would sell its holdings in Tesla because of the carmaker’s refusal to enter into such deals, while Denmark’s largest trade union has joined strike action by the company’s workers in Sweden.

    Nordic countries represent key markets for Tesla, which has a policy of not agreeing to collective bargaining and has said its staff have as good or better terms than those that IF Metall is demanding.

    In a case related to the PostNord action, a court on 27 November ruled that the Swedish Transport Agency must find a way to get licence plates to Tesla.

    Some Swedish pension funds have urged Tesla to sign the agreement with the union, but have so far held off from selling their shares.


    The original article contains 372 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 49%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tesla is expected to appeal the decision though. This was just the first court. We have 3, the last being the supreme Court.

    • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Musk “picked” the wrong fighting grounds here. I’m pretty sure he will lose even at the supreme court eventually. And each day this drags on is a win for the unions

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s why strikes work. If you’re not paid enough, not going to work barely loses you anything. If a workplace is shut down the company loses thousands per day. They still pay rent but earn no money.

        Strikes usually end quickly if the company is focused on money. It’s cheaper to pay workers a raise they originally deserved so they feel like they won, than stay closed.

      • Zpiritual@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Nah, if Tesla had won here Postnord doesn’t have to follow if they plan on bringing it to higher court. Granted they may not have wanted that but hypothetically.