Panera Bread’s Charged Lemonade blamed for a second death, lawsuit alleges - eviltoast

Panera Bread’s highly caffeinated Charged Lemonade is now blamed for a second death, according to a lawsuit filed Monday.

Dennis Brown, of Fleming Island, Florida, drank three Charged Lemonades from a local Panera on Oct. 9 and then suffered a fatal cardiac arrest on his way home, the suit says.

Brown, 46, had an unspecified chromosomal deficiency disorder, a developmental delay and a mild intellectual disability. He lived independently, frequently stopping at Panera after his shifts at a supermarket, the legal complaint says. Because he had high blood pressure, he did not consume energy drinks, it adds.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Most people just correct people or offer additional information. What purpose does calling someone a liar serve? I see you found something useful that shows the caffeine was reduced but it doesn’t prove it’s not because of more ice.

    Also, their statement about caffeine by volume is relevant to the discussion.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The chart is quite useless. It just says “Nutrition & Allergens” and lists a bunch of classes without establishing a base of what was measured. A same sized container or some phony-baloney “serving size” companies love to come up with? I also cannot find information on how calorific caffeine is. If it doesn’t add to calories, the difference you see in the chart is the amount of water, else the difference is a changed formula.

    • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Credibility of content is lost when it’s couched with misinformation.

      Seriously?! If it was due to ice the calories would also be lower.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        In your chart, the sugar was reduced from 124g to 74g but the total carbohydrates remained unchanged at what appears to be 78g. How is it possible to reduce sugar by 40% without a change to calories or total carbohydrates?

        Your information seems couched with misinformation. Should I suggest you’re lying?

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I never made any claims that no other changes were present in the recipe other than reduced caffeine. If the change was “hur dur we include ice now” then the calories would most obviously be lower also. You do you and prop up whatever corporate misinformation you want, the formula was changed and it wasn’t by suddenly deciding to include ice cubes.