• Mika@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Eh I’d argue it can be spin into other direction with more efficiency.

    If people need weapons to defend against the thteat of authoritarian federal government, why just guns? Lets make fiber optics FPVs, shaheds and middlestrike drones legal for everyone :-D

    I mean we can have an era of all top end politicians getting droned, aint this a lovely vision of a future?

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, but your way puts power in the people’s hands. So it’s wrong.

      – Clarence Thomas

    • douz0a0bouz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t that what the national guard is supposed to be? I’m not sure but either way they would never allow a well regulated molitia to operate without their leadership.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its important to keep in mind what a well regulated militia ment within the context of when it was originally written, basically it means a gun club that strictly enforces internal rules.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    “You did good sweetie. Now here is another couple million dollars and a new RV for you. Good boy!”