1 big thing: House Dems ditch "Bidenomics" messaging - eviltoast

I don’t blame them. People can’t afford Bidenomics. I see people complaining all the time but elections have consequences.

I make a lot of money, so I am weathering it just fine. I am just not able to save as much as I would like.

As I said previously, I am not a fan of Trump but groceries were much cheaper under Trump. The cost of items was cheaper under Trump.

I can’t think of any way my life was worse under Trump.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, it’s the Federal deduction of state income tax paid. No, that isn’t correct.The cite I gave you explains it. Income tax is just one portion of it.

    What are you still confused about, here?

    I am not the one confused. Even through I have cited it twice, you still can’t grasp it’s more than income tax. How about you cite where it’s only income tax.

    Yes! As a result, my Federal income tax liability fucking increased!

    As it should have. You should be happy to pay more taxes.

    • crashfrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I am not the one confused.

      You’re incredibly confused. You believe I’m talking about property tax, but I’m talking about income tax.

      As it should have.

      No, it shouldn’t have. A US state shouldn’t be permitted to tax the same income twice. Each jurisdiction justly gets one bite of the apple; deduction of state taxes prevents the state from biting twice (once when you pay them, and again when they receive Federal grants.)

      You should be happy to pay more taxes.

      No, I vote for candidates who lower my taxes, so that I have more money.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        SALT is SALT.

        No, it shouldn’t have. A US state shouldn’t be permitted to tax the same income twice. Each jurisdiction justly gets one bite of the apple; deduction of state taxes prevents the state from biting twice (once when you pay them, and again when they receive Federal grants.)

        I disagree. If you choose to live in a high tax state, that is your choice. It shouldn’t impact the funding of the federal government. This was always a bad decision.

        No, I vote for candidates who lower my taxes, so that I have more money.

        You don’t vote Republican.

        • crashfrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you choose to live in a high tax state, that is your choice.

          If you choose to live in a state that receives a substantial portion of its operating funds from Federal grants, that’s your choice. It’s not my obligation to fund your lifestyle through double state taxation.

          I’d favor an end to SALT deductions if we also ended all Federal grants to states. Agree? Oh, but you probably live in Florida, a state funded largely by placing a burden on all other Americans.

          You don’t vote Republican.

          I do and have. But why would I continue to, when they raised my taxes and insist on lionizing incompetent losers like Trump? Joe Biden wins. Why wouldn’t I follow the winner?

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you choose to live in a state that receives a substantial portion of its operating funds from Federal grants, that’s your choice. It’s not my obligation to fund your lifestyle through double state taxation.

            What state do you think operates primarily from grants? I am not aware of any.

            Oh, but you probably live in Florida

            Look at my name. I live in Oregon. It’s not that hard to figure out.

            • crashfrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              What state do you think operates primarily from grants?

              Did I say “primarily”? You keep responding to points you’re imagining.

              I live in Oregon.

              I mean, I’m not actually a frog.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                If you choose to live in a state that receives a substantial portion of its operating funds from Federal grants

                then what did you mean by this statement? What do you call substantial ?

                I mean, I’m not actually a frog.

                The jury is still out on that.

                • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  then what did you mean by this statement? What do you call substantial ?

                  “More than insubstantial.” Does plain English just puzzle you, or something?