return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1369arrow-down113cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1356arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoGovernment doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
Government doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?