The "Backlash" to Plant-Based Meat Has a Sneaky, if Not Surprising, Explanation - eviltoast
  • abraxas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it really bias you would rather show, than inaccuracy? You sorta just pointed out from your source that bias should not entirely matter in the context of accuracy. But Ok, let me think.

    Bias implies/requires prejudice or compromise. Obviously, if you could show me he is compromised and being paid for his videos by Big Ag, that would be an easy win. Otherwise, I think you’d need to show me that he is prejudiced against veganism (which, if I had to guess, probably needs to be from content outside of the video itself). I would take an argument that all his sources are biased, similarly. It might not show he himself is willfully biased, but that he “fell in with the wrong crowd” by picking sources that steered him in a biased way.

    • Anemia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I picked bias because it was basically the first statement that i could remember that i disagreed with. No other real reason, I didn’t want to pick a single point from the video since i didnt want to presume that you were on board with the entirety.

      1. I don’t think I can show where his funding comes from so lets strike that one.
      2. I don’t think I could show that all his sources are biased (I suspect a couple are, but most of them are probably more or less objective). So lets strike that option as well.
      3. I do think there is an argument to be made based on his other content that he’s biased.

      I looked at his substack and there over 50% 27/51 counted (just skimmed the borderline ones) were tied to highprotein/meat lifestyle or directly/indirectly anti-vegan. There were also a lot of masculinity/testosterone ones that i think are quite relevant, but I didn’t count those. He clearly makes it a large part of his brand either way.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s a fair point, but a tough one. Here’s my problem with it. I’ve watched a lot of his stuff, and his videos on meat/vegan seem to be by far the most impactful. In fact, I have noticed an incredibly high impact rate on otherwise obscure people who publish content anywhere on the spectrum of that particular topic.

        Maybe there is a prejudicial bias, but it seems at least as likely to me that he just started posting more content on that same topic as made him money/viewers. Note, I didn’t say “conclusions that made money” because I think he’d have succeeded equally if his videos concluded the opposite.

        But I also have a problem with likening high protein stuff with “meat lifestyle”. Ketogenic diets are the single biggest explosion in health these days. I have a close friend who is a nutritionist who is obsessed with it. I had family go to dietary counselling and it’s the first item on their list. You can’t walk 5 feet without people talking about how it is salvation or suicide. But despite the fact that meat is almost a critical necessity to make it work, it’s not a diet about meat. Further, I’d like to remind you that ketogenics (and not anti-veganism) are even more of an obsession with fitness/health extremists. I’m sure I totally telegraphed my next point. If you look at the other 50% of his content, a lot of it is exactly that.

        I will say, if I had any red flags about him, they would come from his interviews with conservative personalities. I’ve noticed, unfortunately often, an uncomfortable correlation between conservativism and anti-veganism (I have become opposed to veganism, but am as far from a conservative as you can get). But I also try to keep political views, even ones I disagree with strongly, out of topics that don’t directly seem related to them.