there is no evidence that jesus existed and the first writing about jesus appears 100 years after he supposedly died. his original story was eventually replaced with a plagiarized version from mithraism; so jesus = mithra. not that there is any evidence that mithra existed either.
I believe the academic consensus is he likely (>50% probability) existed, but it is for sure disputed by some. Personally I’m not religious and I accept the possibility he existed or maybe he didn’t. Kind of doesn’t really matter because we can be fairly confident he wasn’t the son of god lol
there is no evidence that jesus existed and the first writing about jesus appears 100 years after he supposedly died. his original story was eventually replaced with a plagiarized version from mithraism; so jesus = mithra. not that there is any evidence that mithra existed either.
I believe the academic consensus is he likely (>50% probability) existed, but it is for sure disputed by some. Personally I’m not religious and I accept the possibility he existed or maybe he didn’t. Kind of doesn’t really matter because we can be fairly confident he wasn’t the son of god lol
the problem being that there isn’t any evidence at all. if there was, his existence would be harder to dispute lol.