The US doesn’t have universal health care — but these states (almost) do - eviltoast
Ten states have uninsured rates below 5 percent. What are they doing right?

Ten states have uninsured rates below 5 percent. What are they doing right?

Universal health care remains an unrealized dream for the United States. But in some parts of the country, the dream has drawn closer to a reality in the 13 years since the Affordable Care Act passed.

Overall, the number of uninsured Americans has fallen from 46.5 million in 2010, the year President Barack Obama signed his signature health care law, to about 26 million today. The US health system still has plenty of flaws — beyond the 8 percent of the population who are uninsured, far higher than in peer countries, many of the people who technically have health insurance still find it difficult to cover their share of their medical bills. Nevertheless, more people enjoy some financial protection against health care expenses than in any previous period in US history.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    922·
    1 year ago

    “Everybody has health insurance” is not universal health care. I have health insurance and thousands of dollars of medical debt. And it’s good insurance.

    • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      118·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry to hear about your situation. This article focuses more on efforts to reduce the number of uninsured people and is aware of what you’re saying about costs:

      …many of the people who technically have health insurance still find it difficult to cover their share of their medical bills. Nevertheless, more people enjoy some financial protection against health care expenses than in any previous period in US history.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        393·
        1 year ago

        That’s great and I’m glad to hear it. It still isn’t universal healthcare by any means. Universal healthcare means removing profit motive from the system.

        • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          131·
          1 year ago

          Yeah the article seems to draw the definition from this:

          The United States is the only wealthy industrialized nation without universal health coverage, a crucial component to ensuring quality health care for all without financial burden that causes delay or avoidance of necessary medical care.

          https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M19-2415

        • Lightborne@lemmy.world
          716·
          1 year ago

          You are wrong. “Universal health care” has nothing to do with removing profit motive. It just means everyone has access to health care, be that through public or private (ie profit-driven) insurance.

          I think you’re meaning to say “single payer” health care, which is where the government spends a portion of tax revenue to pay for health care for everyone.

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.worldEnglish
            5·
            1 year ago

            It just means everyone has access to health care, be that through public or private (ie profit-driven) insurance.

            Yes, with the additional qualification that it does not cause financial hardship. The US does not have this.