NASA May Pay $1 Billion to Destroy the International Space Station. Here’s Why. - eviltoast
  • RewindAgain@futurology.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a shame they can’t move it to a higher orbit & leave it there for future generations. People a century or two from now will be curious about the earliest days of humans in space.

    • CJOtheReal@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It would fall down eventually and may hit some city or populated area, there is a option to shoot it to the moon but that’s super expensive and needs lots of engineering.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Depends how far they boost it up. Once it’s in MEO instead of LEO decay is less of a problem, and there would be ample time to achieve further boosts. For example the GPS satellites will take millenia to move considerably closer to earth.

        The article actually mentions the idea, but apparently it’s bound to physically fall apart after a while, and it’s a big thing that could make a lot of debris. I guess you could put it in a net, but I’m not sure how cool a bundle of scrap that used to be the ISS is. The smart folks at NASA seem sure there’s no point.

        • CJOtheReal@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah the ISS gets hit by space debris form time to time and they need to do very frequent maintenance to not let it fall apart

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would be better to save a few sections as a museum and dismantle and recycle the rest of the materials in space.

    We will eventually need to build space ships in orbit, so why not harvest the precious metals and such in orbit? It is currently very expensive to take materials off planet. The metals could be reused eventually and reforged into something else.

    • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You need manufacturing capabilities in orbit before you can “recycle” things, and that’s way off. It’s still more effective to build things on earth and bring them into orbit because we can’t actually build anything in space yet.