It’s possible that multiple things can be going on at once, I’m sure globalization & neoliberalism and the lowering of living standards in the Western world is partially responsible too. This research however is about a new threat and the future.

“radio frequency bands and orbital slots in low Earth orbit are limited, and first movers for those resources can gain priority.”

LEO is about to get very crowded. Also, consider the fact most of the world distrusts both China & America, and will want their own “sovereign” capabilities. How many will have the capability to achieve this though? Europe is already perusing this with its IRIS² program, and lately has even less reason to make itself vulnerable by relying on US technology.

No one knows exactly where we are going to end up when it comes to global temperature increasing over coming decades, but the one thing we know for sure is that it’s going to . That means lots of agriculture is going to be disrupted. Good news then that we are finding ways to accelerate plants adaptability to brand new weather patterns and environments. We’re going to need all the help we can get when it comes to that.

The test, per WSJ sources, spans categories like history, politics, and ethics, with questions such as “Who is the greatest leader in modern Chinese history?” demanding Xi-centric replies.

I wonder if there will be any other world leaders tempted by this idea? A certain elderly man with a taste for bright orange makeup springs to mind.

I wasn’t thinking about the little robots figuring it out. I was thinking of humans designing it, and releasing it (perhaps accidentally).

thanks, I added it now.

It’s obvious to see why this is happening.

US AI is concentrated in a few super-large players with closed systems chasing AGI. Chinese AI is free to use by the world’s developers for today’s real world applications of AI. Chinese AI is even starting to become the default in the US among Silicon Valley start-ups.

Around the world, tens of thousands of businesses are going to want their own AI systems & they’ll build that on top of open-source foundations.

Interesting to see Chinese Open-Source AI ahead of the US in global usage figures.

It’s good news to see fossil fuel cars in such steep decline. This contrasts with the US, where gas cars are still near 90% of new sales. It’s China and Europe who are embracing EVs the fastest, though in China, combustion engine cars are still near 50% of sales.

But it’s not all good news. Half of those EVs are hybrid models. Data shows drivers with these still use a significant amount of gas, almost as much as ICE cars. The EU has set a 2035 deadline to ban all new gas car sales, and it seems that will include these polluting hybrid cars, too.

An irony here is I heard about this via an AI newsletter I subscribe to. It supports itself by selling ads for AI companies. The ad beside this story was AI-generated & touted a company called Genarena that sells AI-generated infographics. The example was a “Top 10 Liveable Global Cities”, where the No 1 & No 2 spot were the same city …

New Pew research shows striking differences between AI experts’ views on AI and the general public’s views. On jobs, 21% of the public rate AI’s impact as positive, for AI experts, it’s 73%. On the economy, the corresponding figures are 21% and 69%. One of the few areas of convergence? Few on either side (9% & 11%) think AI will be good for elections.

Another interesting area of convergence? AI experts and the public mostly agree about which types of jobs are at risk from AI. One of the few differences is in self-driving AI. The public mostly thinks trucker jobs are safe from AI, but the experts don’t.

However, most of this polling reveal differences. Only 24% of the public think AI will personally benefit them. That figures is 76% for the AI experts. The big problem here? It’s the AI experts, and their interests, in the driving seat when it comes to legislation around AI.

The AI industry who has the US administration in its pocket. Their latest suggestion is to ban AI regulation at the state level, and only allow it at the federal level (which, conveniently, they completely control).

Even if they succeed, it won’t change the reality and public perception of AI, and it seems like it will store up conflict and clashes to come.

Pew Research - How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence

At least it is starting to decrease in China - https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-co2-emissions-have-now-been-flat-or-falling-for-18-months/

Doctors in China have successfully treated a woman with type 1 diabetes using lab-grown insulin-producing cells made from her own tissue. Scientists reprogrammed her cells into stem cells, then grew them into small clusters capable of releasing insulin. One year after receiving the transplant, her blood sugar levels remain normal without any medication. This marks the first time in history that a person with type 1 diabetes has been cured of insulin dependence using cells derived entirely from their own body, not from a donor or embryo, paving the way for personalized treatments for millions.

This expands the range of ‘Work From Home’ to include physical labor. Humanoid robots aren’t far off the point (2030s?) where they can do most unskilled labor. With telepresence, they can take those jobs sooner.

This also brings something else closer. The looming crisis over what our governing economic model will be when human labor can no longer compete for wages with AI & robots.

Anyone who has ever read neurologist Oliver Sacks’ classic essay collection ‘The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat’ might wonder about the downsides of having a protein nanowire brain extension. The lesson from the book is that small changes to the brain can have enormous consequences for consciousness and our experience of reality.

Who knows? Perhaps it might be like a permanent magic mushroom trip where you can see and talk to interdimensional machine elves, and that would be an upside for some people.

Yes, and there is also the possibility that it could be upon us quite suddenly. It may just take one fundamental breakthrough to make the leap from what we have currently to AGI, and once that breakthrough is achieved, AGI could arrive quite quickly. It may not be a linear process of improvement, where we reach the summit in many years.

Manna need to get quieter drones. People who live beside their base of operation don’t like the noise & disturbance.

Also, if you’re reasonably smart and self-motivated the 21st century world abounds with the materials to let you learn much of what you would in college. Not specialized learning maybe, but for generalized learning, yes.

https://www.openculture.com/freeonlinecourses

An Irish drone delivery company Manna has been getting lots of complaints, apparently its not much fun living beside its base of operations.

https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2025/0820/1529313-drone-planning-dublin/

Won’t there be insurance for this?

If companies like FedEx can bear the cost of liabilities for huge numbers of human drivers, doesn’t that suggest the burden will be far less for robo-vehicle car companies?