Does it seem like we’re mixing two concepts, having servers for users and content? - eviltoast

It feels like they’re two different roles. It might be better to have user-orientated servers that prioritise federation of content and only have a couple of meta-style communities, and other servers which prioritise being the go-to place for discussion on a particular topic and less a place that manages a large number of user accounts.

It just seems like two really distinct roles all servers are trying to do at the same time, and it’s leading to larger sites with a lot of users duplicating all the same subs, rather than there being any particular spot for certain types of discussion.

It also means the server hosting a particular type of discussion might defed certain instances to prevent trolling when it’s a sensitive topic, but it wouldn’t affect a large userbase who have that as their home server, it would only be moderating the discussion for the content areas they specialise in.

Thoughts?

  • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. And it’s interesting to see how communities are spread out even among related topics. For example if you see my post here with a list of crafting / maker communities, generally the first one or two under each heading are the most active and they’re all over the place.

    .world and .ml and kbin.social yes, but also .ca, blahaj, sopuli, and various others. And that’s just the quickly-establishing communities within one niche!